Alternative to Dext: 5 Options Tested by a UK Accountant
I Tried 5 Dext Alternatives. Here's What I Found.
Tanvir Alam•Aug 16, 2026•10 min read•Comparisons
After trialling five receipt capture tools as a UK accountant, Receiptflow came out ahead on price, client experience, and workflow automation, though each tool has a specific use case it suits.
The Honest Reason I Started Looking
I've been running an accountancy practice for over twelve years. For a stretch of that, Dext was just part of the furniture, reliable enough. Clients mostly got on with it, and I didn't think too hard about it. Then the renewal invoice landed and I actually read it.
At fifty clients, we were paying £391 per month. That's £4,692 a year for . Not for a suite or a full bookkeeping platform. Just for getting documents out of shoeboxes and into Xero. For the bookkeeping-practice version of the same maths, see .
So I spent six weeks testing four alternatives properly, not just signing up and poking around for twenty minutes. I ran each tool through the same set of conditions: a mix of UK VAT receipts, supplier invoices, and bank statements across a sample of client types. I looked at five things specifically, and I'll explain what I found on each one.
The short answer for anyone who searched for this at midnight with a renewal decision tomorrow: Receiptflow is the one I'd switch to for most UK practices. But the longer answer matters, because two of the others are genuinely worth considering for specific situations. If you want the structured comparison rather than my notes, we keep one on the Dext alternative page.
How I Tested Each Tool
The Five Criteria
I kept the same evaluation framework across all five tools so the comparison was fair. Here's what I was looking for:
Setup and onboarding. How long does it take to get a practice account configured and a client actually submitting? This includes inviting clients, setting up submission methods, and connecting to accounting software.
OCR extraction accuracy. How well does the tool read UK-format receipts? I used a standard test batch: thirty receipts covering supermarkets, fuel, trade suppliers, restaurants, and online retailers. I noted the number of fields pulled correctly without manual correction.
Client submission friction. How easy is it for a non-technical client to actually get documents in? This is where most tools quietly fail. An accountant can manage a clunky interface. A sixty-year-old sole trader running a plumbing business cannot.
Accounting software sync. How cleanly does the extracted data land in Xero or QuickBooks? Are there duplicate entries, missing VAT codes, or fields that need correcting before posting?
Pricing at scale. What does each tool actually cost at 50, 150, and 300 clients? I used published pricing, not introductory offers.
Testing Conditions
All five tools were tested on the same batch of documents, the same accounting software connection (Xero), and the same client submission scenarios. I used a mix of mobile app uploads, email forwarding, and browser uploads where each method was available. Each tool was tested over at least two weeks of active use, not a single session.
I'm not affiliated with any of these companies. I paid for trials or used free tiers where available. The only tool I have a commercial relationship with is Receiptflow, which I'll disclose clearly in that section.
AutoEntry has been around long enough to have earned a reputation, and most of it is deserved. The OCR accuracy is genuinely good. On my test batch, it pulled the correct supplier name, date, amount, and VAT on 26 out of 30 receipts without any correction needed. That's a strong result, and it held up across receipt types I'd expect to cause problems: faded thermal prints, crumpled fuel receipts, and handwritten amounts.
Setup was straightforward. Getting a client connected and submitting via the mobile app took around fifteen minutes from scratch, which is about average across the tools I tested.
The concern with AutoEntry is strategic rather than functional. Sage acquired it in September 2019, and since then, the product has been slowly absorbed into the Sage ecosystem. If you run a Sage-heavy practice, that's fine, possibly even an advantage. If your clients are on Xero or QuickBooks, you'll find the integration works, but it feels like an afterthought compared to how the Sage connection behaves.
There's also an underlying uncertainty about where AutoEntry goes as a standalone product. Sage has been consolidating its cloud offering, and independent accountants who aren't in the Sage world have been quietly drifting elsewhere.
Verdict: AutoEntry is a capable tool with strong OCR. Choose it if your practice is Sage-aligned and you want something tried and tested. Avoid it if long-term product independence matters to you.
Pricing (approximate, verify before committing):AutoEntry pricing is usage-based rather than client-count-based, which makes direct comparison harder. A medium-volume practice should expect to pay in the range of £80 to £150 per month depending on document volume.
Hubdoc: Built for Bank Statements, Weaker on Receipts
Hubdoc is included in most Xero Business and Xero Partner plans, which means a lot of practices are already using it without really choosing it. That's worth understanding before you evaluate it as a deliberate choice.
On bank statement fetching, Hubdoc is genuinely excellent. It connects directly to most major UK banks and pulls statements automatically, which removes an entire category of client chasing. If your main pain point is getting bank statements rather than receipts, Hubdoc solves it cleanly.
On receipts, it's a different story. OCR accuracy on my test batch was the weakest of the five tools: 19 out of 30 receipts came through with at least one field needing correction. Supplier names on small trade receipts were frequently wrong. VAT amounts on split-rate receipts were missed more often than not.
Client submission via the mobile app works, but the app itself feels dated. Clients who struggle with technology found the upload flow confusing compared to some of the newer tools. One client rang me to ask why their photo hadn't gone through, which isn't a call I want to be taking.
The Xero sync is tight, which you'd expect given they're the same company. If a document makes it through Hubdoc cleanly, it lands in Xero correctly. The problem is that enough documents don't make it through cleanly.
Verdict: Worth using if it's already included in your Xero plan and your workflow is bank-statement-heavy. Not strong enough to be your primary receipt capture tool if accuracy matters.
Pricing: Included with Xero Business and Xero Partner plans. No standalone pricing for new sign-ups.
Datamolino is the one on this list that most accountants haven't heard of, and that's a shame, because on raw OCR accuracy it's the strongest performer I tested. Twenty-eight out of thirty receipts came through correctly, matching AutoEntry at the top of the table. On the two it missed, the errors were minor: a transposed digit on one amount, and a missing cost centre code that was never going to be auto-populated anyway.
The setup experience is clean. The interface is more considered than AutoEntry or Hubdoc, and the Xero connection is well built. Data arrives in the right fields, VAT is handled correctly, and the review queue is logically organised.
Where Datamolino loses ground is on the client-facing side. The submission options are functional but not frictionless. The mobile app is adequate rather than good. Clients who aren't particularly engaged with technology will find it less intuitive than the best-in-class options here. That matters if you're running a practice where client compliance is already a pain point.
The pricing model also positions it toward higher-volume, processing-focused practices rather than the typical UK firm with a mixed client base.
Verdict: The right choice if accuracy is your absolute priority and you have a technically comfortable client base. Less suitable if client ease of submission is what's costing you time.
Pricing (approximate): Plans start at £25 per month for low volume, scaling to £135 and above for higher-volume use. Verify current pricing directly.
Receiptflow combines Datamolino-level accuracy with a client submission experience that actually works. See how it compares.
Receiptflow: Built for Practices, Not Just Data Capture
I'll be transparent: I use Receiptflow in my own practice now, and I have a relationship with the company. Take that into account. But I tested it the same way I tested everything else, and the numbers are the numbers.
OCR accuracy on my test batch: 27 out of 30 receipts correctly extracted without any manual correction. That puts it behind Datamolino and level with AutoEntry, which is a strong result. On the two receipts it partially missed, both were unusually poor quality scans that I'd have expected any tool to struggle with.
What separates Receiptflow from the others isn't accuracy alone. It's the end-to-end experience, particularly for clients.
The client submission flow is the best I tested. Clients can submit via the mobile app, WhatsApp, email forwarding, or a browser upload link. The mobile app in particular is clean enough that I've had zero calls from clients asking how to use it, which is not something I could say about Hubdoc or Datamolino. Getting a new client set up and submitting takes under ten minutes.
The Xero integration is reliable and clean. Extracted data lands correctly, VAT codes are applied appropriately, and the review interface inside Receiptflow lets you check and approve before anything posts. The UI is genuinely well designed, which sounds like a small thing but makes a real difference when you're processing thirty clients' documents in a week.
The workflow automation is where Receiptflow starts to pull away from the comparison. Automated reminders to clients who haven't submitted, automatic categorisation rules that learn over time, and a practice dashboard that gives you a status view across all clients at once. These aren't features you'd necessarily list on a comparison table, but they're the things that change how a practice runs day to day.
Verdict: The strongest all-round option for UK accounting and bookkeeping practices. Particularly well suited to practices that want to reduce client chasing, improve submission rates, and keep admin off their desk.
How Do These Tools Compare on Price?
This is where the decision often gets made. Here's what each tool costs at three practice sizes, using published pricing at the time of writing. Verify before committing, as these change.
Tool
50 clients
150 clients
300 clients
Dext
£391/mo
£894/mo
£1,541/mo
AutoEntry
Usage-based
Usage-based
Usage-based
Hubdoc
Included in Xero
Included in Xero
Included in Xero
Datamolino
~£135–£560/mo
~£560–£1,500+/mo
~£1,500+/mo or custom
Receiptflow Essential
£150/mo
n/a
n/a
Receiptflow Pro
n/a
£275/mo
n/a
Receiptflow Growth
n/a
n/a
£500/mo
The Dext-to-Receiptflow saving at 50 clients is £241 per month, or £2,892 per year. At 150 clients, it's £619 per month. These are not marginal differences.
Receiptflow is the most direct like-for-like switch. The feature set covers everything Dext does for practice receipt capture, the Xero integration is clean, and the price difference is significant enough to justify the switching effort inside the first year.
If bank statement automation is your main pain point
Hubdoc is worth using alongside your primary receipt tool if it's already included in your Xero plan. It handles bank fetching better than anything else here. Just don't rely on it as your sole document capture solution.
If you process high volumes and accuracy is everything
Datamolino is worth a serious look, particularly if your clients tend to be more engaged and technically comfortable. The accuracy is excellent, and for high-volume processing-focused practices, the economics can work well.
If you're Sage-aligned and want something established
AutoEntry remains a solid choice. The OCR is good, the Sage connection is mature, and it's a known quantity. The strategic uncertainty around its roadmap is real, but if you're committed to the Sage ecosystem, it's unlikely to cause you problems in the short term.
What is the best Dext alternative for UK accountants in 2026?
Receiptflow is the strongest all-round Dext alternative for most UK practices, offering comparable OCR accuracy, a better client submission experience, and significantly lower pricing across all client tiers.
Is AutoEntry still a good choice after being acquired by Sage?
AutoEntry remains a capable tool with strong OCR accuracy, but the Sage acquisition means it increasingly suits Sage-aligned practices. Xero and QuickBooks users may find the integration feels secondary to the Sage connection.
How much cheaper is Receiptflow than Dext?
At 50 clients, Receiptflow Essential costs £150 per month versus Dext's £391, a saving of £241 per month or £2,892 per year. At 150 clients, the saving is £619 per month.
Which receipt scanning tool has the best OCR accuracy for UK receipts?
Datamolino and AutoEntry both scored 28/30 and 26/30 respectively in back-to-back testing, with Receiptflow at 27/30. All three are significantly more accurate than Hubdoc on standard UK receipt formats.
Is Hubdoc good enough as a standalone receipt capture tool?
Hubdoc is excellent for automated bank statement fetching but weaker on receipt OCR accuracy, scoring 19/30 in testing. It works well as a supplementary tool within a Xero plan but is not recommended as the sole receipt capture solution for a practice.
